mirror of
https://github.com/overte-org/overte.git
synced 2025-04-07 22:33:04 +02:00
Ban only by machine fingerprint, when possible
This commit is contained in:
parent
a3c123818d
commit
a8831e89ff
1 changed files with 51 additions and 53 deletions
|
@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
|
|||
#include <NumericalConstants.h>
|
||||
#include <SettingHandle.h>
|
||||
#include <AvatarData.h> //for KillAvatarReason
|
||||
#include <FingerprintUtils.h>
|
||||
#include "DomainServerNodeData.h"
|
||||
|
||||
const QString SETTINGS_DESCRIPTION_RELATIVE_PATH = "/resources/describe-settings.json";
|
||||
|
@ -439,7 +440,7 @@ bool DomainServerSettingsManager::unpackPermissionsForKeypath(const QString& key
|
|||
foreach (QVariant permsHash, permissionsList) {
|
||||
NodePermissionsPointer perms { new NodePermissions(permsHash.toMap()) };
|
||||
QString id = perms->getID();
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
NodePermissionsKey idKey = perms->getKey();
|
||||
|
||||
if (mapPointer->contains(idKey)) {
|
||||
|
@ -484,7 +485,7 @@ void DomainServerSettingsManager::unpackPermissions() {
|
|||
// make sure that this permission row is for a non-empty hardware
|
||||
if (perms->getKey().first.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
_macPermissions.remove(perms->getKey());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// we removed a row from the MAC permissions, we'll need a re-pack
|
||||
needPack = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -555,7 +556,7 @@ void DomainServerSettingsManager::unpackPermissions() {
|
|||
QList<QHash<NodePermissionsKey, NodePermissionsPointer>> permissionsSets;
|
||||
permissionsSets << _standardAgentPermissions.get() << _agentPermissions.get()
|
||||
<< _groupPermissions.get() << _groupForbiddens.get()
|
||||
<< _ipPermissions.get() << _macPermissions.get()
|
||||
<< _ipPermissions.get() << _macPermissions.get()
|
||||
<< _machineFingerprintPermissions.get();
|
||||
|
||||
foreach (auto permissionSet, permissionsSets) {
|
||||
|
@ -668,71 +669,68 @@ void DomainServerSettingsManager::processNodeKickRequestPacket(QSharedPointer<Re
|
|||
// ensure that the connect permission is clear
|
||||
userPermissions->clear(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// otherwise we apply the kick to the IP from active socket for this node and the MAC address
|
||||
|
||||
// remove connect permissions for the IP (falling back to the public socket if not yet active)
|
||||
auto& kickAddress = matchingNode->getActiveSocket()
|
||||
? matchingNode->getActiveSocket()->getAddress()
|
||||
: matchingNode->getPublicSocket().getAddress();
|
||||
|
||||
// probably isLoopback covers it, as whenever I try to ban an agent on same machine as the domain-server
|
||||
// it is always 127.0.0.1, but looking at the public and local addresses just to be sure
|
||||
// TODO: soon we will have feedback (in the form of a message to the client) after we kick. When we
|
||||
// do, we will have a success flag, and perhaps a reason for failure. For now, just don't do it.
|
||||
if (kickAddress == limitedNodeList->getPublicSockAddr().getAddress() ||
|
||||
kickAddress == limitedNodeList->getLocalSockAddr().getAddress() ||
|
||||
kickAddress.isLoopback() ) {
|
||||
qWarning() << "attempt to kick node running on same machine as domain server, ignoring KickRequest";
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
NodePermissionsKey ipAddressKey(kickAddress.toString(), QUuid());
|
||||
|
||||
// check if there were already permissions for the IP
|
||||
bool hadIPPermissions = hasPermissionsForIP(kickAddress);
|
||||
|
||||
// grab or create permissions for the given IP address
|
||||
auto ipPermissions = _ipPermissions[ipAddressKey];
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hadIPPermissions || ipPermissions->can(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain)) {
|
||||
newPermissions = true;
|
||||
|
||||
ipPermissions->clear(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// potentially remove connect permissions for the MAC address and machine fingerprint
|
||||
// remove connect permissions for the machine fingerprint
|
||||
DomainServerNodeData* nodeData = static_cast<DomainServerNodeData*>(matchingNode->getLinkedData());
|
||||
if (nodeData) {
|
||||
// mac address first
|
||||
NodePermissionsKey macAddressKey(nodeData->getHardwareAddress(), 0);
|
||||
// get this machine's fingerprint
|
||||
auto domainServerFingerprint = FingerprintUtils::getMachineFingerprint();
|
||||
|
||||
bool hadMACPermissions = hasPermissionsForMAC(nodeData->getHardwareAddress());
|
||||
|
||||
auto macPermissions = _macPermissions[macAddressKey];
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hadMACPermissions || macPermissions->can(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain)) {
|
||||
newPermissions = true;
|
||||
|
||||
macPermissions->clear(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain);
|
||||
if (nodeData->getMachineFingerprint() == domainServerFingerprint) {
|
||||
qWarning() << "attempt to kick node running on same machine as domain server (by fingerprint), ignoring KickRequest";
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// now for machine fingerprint
|
||||
NodePermissionsKey machineFingerprintKey(nodeData->getMachineFingerprint().toString(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// check if there were already permissions for the fingerprint
|
||||
bool hadFingerprintPermissions = hasPermissionsForMachineFingerprint(nodeData->getMachineFingerprint());
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// grab or create permissions for the given fingerprint
|
||||
auto fingerprintPermissions = _machineFingerprintPermissions[machineFingerprintKey];
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// write them
|
||||
if (!hadFingerprintPermissions || fingerprintPermissions->can(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain)) {
|
||||
newPermissions = true;
|
||||
fingerprintPermissions->clear(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// if no node data, all we can do is IP address
|
||||
auto& kickAddress = matchingNode->getActiveSocket()
|
||||
? matchingNode->getActiveSocket()->getAddress()
|
||||
: matchingNode->getPublicSocket().getAddress();
|
||||
|
||||
// probably isLoopback covers it, as whenever I try to ban an agent on same machine as the domain-server
|
||||
// it is always 127.0.0.1, but looking at the public and local addresses just to be sure
|
||||
// TODO: soon we will have feedback (in the form of a message to the client) after we kick. When we
|
||||
// do, we will have a success flag, and perhaps a reason for failure. For now, just don't do it.
|
||||
if (kickAddress == limitedNodeList->getPublicSockAddr().getAddress() ||
|
||||
kickAddress == limitedNodeList->getLocalSockAddr().getAddress() ||
|
||||
kickAddress.isLoopback() ) {
|
||||
qWarning() << "attempt to kick node running on same machine as domain server, ignoring KickRequest";
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
NodePermissionsKey ipAddressKey(kickAddress.toString(), QUuid());
|
||||
|
||||
// check if there were already permissions for the IP
|
||||
bool hadIPPermissions = hasPermissionsForIP(kickAddress);
|
||||
|
||||
// grab or create permissions for the given IP address
|
||||
auto ipPermissions = _ipPermissions[ipAddressKey];
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hadIPPermissions || ipPermissions->can(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain)) {
|
||||
newPermissions = true;
|
||||
|
||||
ipPermissions->clear(NodePermissions::Permission::canConnectToDomain);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// if we are here, then we kicked them, so send the KillAvatar message to everyone
|
||||
|
||||
// if we are here, then we kicked them, so send the KillAvatar message
|
||||
auto packet = NLPacket::create(PacketType::KillAvatar, NUM_BYTES_RFC4122_UUID + sizeof(KillAvatarReason), true);
|
||||
packet->write(nodeUUID.toRfc4122());
|
||||
packet->writePrimitive(KillAvatarReason::NoReason);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// send to avatar mixer, it sends the kill to everyone else
|
||||
limitedNodeList->broadcastToNodes(std::move(packet), NodeSet() << NodeType::AvatarMixer);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -743,7 +741,7 @@ void DomainServerSettingsManager::processNodeKickRequestPacket(QSharedPointer<Re
|
|||
// we've changed permissions, time to store them to disk and emit our signal to say they have changed
|
||||
packPermissions();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// we emit this no matter what -- though if this isn't a new permission probably 2 people are racing to kick and this
|
||||
// person lost the race. No matter, just be sure this is called as otherwise it takes like 10s for the person being banned
|
||||
// to go away
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue