From 2d68cfa5e7f6a3306d7a7ad64bef2d429fa53dcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Walton <simon@highfidelity.io>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:04:24 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use unique_lock::unlock() instead of unique_lock::release()

... which actually has the opposite effect
---
 libraries/networking/src/udt/Socket.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libraries/networking/src/udt/Socket.cpp b/libraries/networking/src/udt/Socket.cpp
index 67af69ae8f..20cb30dbd8 100644
--- a/libraries/networking/src/udt/Socket.cpp
+++ b/libraries/networking/src/udt/Socket.cpp
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ void Socket::handleRemoteAddressChange(HifiSockAddr previousAddress, HifiSockAdd
             _connectionsHash.erase(connectionIter);
             connection->setDestinationAddress(currentAddress);
             _connectionsHash[currentAddress] = move(connection);
-            connectionsLock.release();
+            connectionsLock.unlock();
 
             Lock sequenceNumbersLock(_unreliableSequenceNumbersMutex);
             const auto sequenceNumbersIter = _unreliableSequenceNumbers.find(previousAddress);